Posted: October 7, 2014
Tags:
By:

5 Insights to Survive Anything

pathsSo it happens, that unthinkable thing. A phone call or an unanticipated Friday meeting, pick your poison. Something happens that will change your life forever, or at the very least, place you on a different path. After the shock wears off a little bit, the anger sets in for a long stay and you stop trying to bargain your way out of your new, unwanted reality. Then and only then, you ask yourself and every other person who will listen, “How am I going to survive this?”

Well, you have come to the right place because I, hands down, know how to survive. I never aimed to become a member of the uber-resilience club, but here I am anyway, a charter member. And I want you to know what I have learned, so that when your phone call comes, and it will one day if it hasn’t already, you will know that you can survive.

You see, I woke up one morning to learn my only child, a 21-year-old son, had died when a bass boat collided with a jet ski. Just like that. And thus I was on my way to figuring out if I would live or die.

So, 12 years later, here are my 5 insights for surviving anything. Read More

Share

Posted: August 5, 2014
Tags:
By:

The Financial Impact of Executive Leadership

My research passion for the last ten years has been in the area of top team behavior, specifically how the most senior executives in a company work together and how that level of effectiveness correlates with business performance metrics, over time. Not surprisingly, the linkages are proving to be tight and significant. As you will see on this blog over the coming months, some of the best social scientists in the world have been asking the same questions and running their own experiments. Deloitte’s CIO Journal will get the disscussion going for us, with this article that originally appeared in Deloitte’s CIO Journal in 2012, reposted here with permission:

The Financial Impact of Executive Leadership

Most businesses recognize the role their senior leadership teams play in driving financial performance. Yet measuring the direct impact of company leadership on outcomes such as corporate earnings or equity value has proven difficult for researchers.

Deloitte spent six months (August 2011 to January 2012) studying investment analysts’ perception of the relationship between corporate leadership and performance.

“We wanted to find a quantitative metric for the value of leadership,” says Adam Canwell, a human capital consulting partner with Deloitte Australia. “We set out to understand the impact of leadership on long-term equity value, its relative importance compared with other aspects of company performance, and the size of the potential increase or decrease in value that it can deliver.”

Through interviews and surveys with 445 investment analysts, Deloitte found they routinely factor the quality of a company’s senior leadership team into their valuations, and that effective senior leadership can add 15 percent to a company’s value. (For the specific leadership capabilities investment analysts seek in corporate executives, see “CIO Leadership: The Capabilities Investment Analysts Value”) Read More

Share

Posted: July 14, 2014
Tags:
By:

Board Member Alignment

Screen Shot 2014-07-11 at 2.29.28 PMI’m frequently asked about the work we do to help corporate Boards become more integrated. How do we get a room full of very successful, outspoken and highly polarized Board members to govern together? Do we build a Board as we might an executive team? Do we coach outside directors as we would those from the inside?

We have developed a reputation over the years for gaining the trust and confidence of very senior leaders, leaders who sit on many Boards. These very busy, brilliant business people don’t suffer fools easily, so it is always with a great sense of privilege   that we find them choosing to buy into our belief that the best Boards have members who are fiercely collaborative. They will surely continue to compete in their own markets, but they recognize the value of adding great teamwork to their leadership repertoire. We have found that these men and women share a deep desire that the entire Board experiences success and that along with that success the business they govern will thrive and prosper.

So what happens that causes a Board member to set aside his or her highly energized agenda to focus on what will most help others become comfortable and feel heard? The answer to this question is complex but the principles are fairly straightforward. So we thought we would start a discussion about effective Board member integration by sharing the underlying beliefs that shape our work. These principles and some practices are chronicled here and all we ask is that you take a look and let us know what you think. Read More

Share

Posted: June 9, 2014
Tags:
By:

Culture Change Leadership: Principles, Practices, Pitfalls and Traps

changeVolumes (quite literally) have been written on the subjects of change and transition. Here we hope to hit a few highlights, give you a couple of clues of what to be on the lookout for and how to anticipate and respond to some likely attitudes and behaviors. Additional conceptual grounding appears at the end of the blog entry on change and transition, resistance, and teams. Some of what follows may be useful in the early stage in the process of “planning for change” and other information may be most relevant as you actually try to implement what is being designed.

Be on the lookout for:

1. Resistance

People can resist change actively and passively.

Active resistance may be manifested by deliberate opposition, reduction in output, chronic quarrels, subtle hostility, “why this won’t work,” agitating others, not reporting problems, and denying problems.

Passive resistance may include withholding information, foot-dragging, no confrontation (but no productivity), not attacking solutions (but not supporting it either), “we’ve always done it this way,” overcomplicating the new way.

People resist because (any/all of what follows): They think they will lose something, they do not understand implications, they assess the situation differently from those initiating the change and perceive more cost than benefit, they fear they will not be able to develop new skills and behaviors that will be required, they have limited tolerance for change, to save face (“if the change is occurring, what we’ve been doing is devalued”), loss of control, discomfort of excess uncertainty.

For example: rumors, talking “behind people’s backs,” saying one thing in meetings and other things in private conversations, confusion about whom to include in/exclude from communications, and skepticism.

No matter how well “the case has been made” for the innovation some will experience a loss (of the way things have been done, self concept of being successful and knowing the ropes, etc.)

Read More

Share

Posted: April 3, 2014
Tags:
By:

A New Breed of Top Leaders Who Value Coaching

In the old days…

coaching puzzleWhen I first began coaching members of the C-suite nearly 30 years ago senior leaders had no real interest in working with executive coaches. Back then, coaching was rare and those who were labeled as coaches were frequently called productivity improvement consultants. These clinical or industrial psychologists were brought in to communicate performance expectations on behalf of the boss, usually in a last ditch attempt to get a derailed key leader back on track. Although top leaders occasionally tapped into the expertise of leadership experts they did so in secret and their new abilities were almost always developed serendipitously versus strategically.

Shift gears to today…

A 2013 Executive Coaching Survey conducted by the Stanford Business School with The Miles Group concluded that nearly one-third of CEOs have worked with an executive coach and/or participated in some sort of intensive leadership development experience. Almost half of senior executives in general have participated in coaching. Interestingly, all the leaders surveyed (100 percent) said they would welcome coaching to enhance their development.

Today’s top leaders recognize that senior level roles by design are isolated, complex and fraught with both political and psychological dynamics that are difficult and exhausting to sort out alone. Many times, these leaders experienced the collateral damage associated with bosses who led inappropriately because they were not sufficiently self-aware, vulnerable or emotionally intelligent. Choosing to achieve results where both people and work are aligned, these leaders are eager to get another perspective and gain new skills in areas that were once labeled as “soft” or low priority.  The newest breed of top leaders have benefitted from coaching that helps them increase their self-awareness, make honest assessments about how their personality impacts business decisions, reflect on their ego/motives and clarify the values that will carry them through turbulent times. The consequences of the absence of these capabilities played out in front of these leaders early in their careers. They saw leaders flame out or destroy promising futures because they were not interested in their own growth and development as a top leader. Read More

Share

Posted: January 1, 2014
Tags:
By:

To Succeed in 2014, Stay Away from New Year’s Resolutions

New-Year_Resolutions_listIt happens every year. We resolve to break a bad habit or start a new, healthy practice. Gym memberships are purchased, e-cigarettes are ordered and refrigerators are stocked with apples and kale. Your teenager is enlisted to help move the flat screen out of your bedroom in hopes you will gain an extra hour of sleep each night while others are watching Jimmy Fallon.

As January rolls in, our good intentions show up at the workplace, too. Like the new kid at school decked out in a hipster backpack and Converse sneakers, our noise canceling ear buds dangle from our necks and each wrist is circled with a device, one monitoring our health and the other our activity. We set the alarms on our calendars to remind us to drink more water throughout the day and call our mothers on Sunday.

Taking steps to change behavior for the better is always a good idea, right? I mean, what could be wrong with focusing our energies on those things that help us to improve?

Well, for the most part, there is absolutely nothing wrong with setting new goals in the New Year. Some researchers have found that writing a desired outcome down on paper or sharing a clear commitment out loud with others can increase tenfold the likelihood of achieving that goal. So, don’t get me wrong, there is only an upside to goal setting.

However, it has also been said that less than 8% of the people who set New Year’s goals achieve them. This does not surprise me at all because setting a goal and achieving a goal are very different entities. It’s all in the execution, after all.

In fact, after spending thousands of hours with leaders in the C-suite over the past 30 years, I have observed that New Year’s resolutions are NOT the best way to achieve important goals. The leaders who have been the most successful personally and professionally are those who regularly and quietly take stock of what is/is not working.

Without any sign of insecurity, they check in with others throughout the year to “see how things are going”. They know that others can see what they cannot and that their perspectives are important to understand if business priorities are going to be successfully implemented. To stay the course, they are continually sensing and interacting, adjusting and readjusting how work is done and who does the work so that everyone in the business (or in their families, as the case may be) is pulling together to do the right things to succeed.

The best leaders are able to figure out what risks are worthwhile to take and are likely to pan out in positive ways. They know when to stay the course and do not have any problem disappointing those who wish they would move things in another direction. This skill of knowing when to fold them and when to hold them throughout the year is infinitely more important than the ability to make a sweeping change at a designated point in time. Read More

Share

Posted: November 25, 2013
Tags:
By:

The Self-Awareness Lens: Mirror, Mirror on the Wall

self awareness lensThe Self-Awareness Lens is the one most often lost or buried in the bottom of the leader’s bag. Leaders see the word “self-awareness” and they back off as though the word itself might cause them to lose their ability to control the world around them. Yet, self-aware leaders hold the keys to the castle. Leaders from CEO Glenn Senk of Urban Outfitters to Alysa Miller CEO of Public Radio International advised University of Chicago Booth School of Business MBA students to “be self-aware by seeking as many varied experiences as possible, developing emotional intelligence and using good listening skills” as it provides a competitive edge. Leaders who are self-aware know what they treasure and hold dear, they understand how to create the right path by tapping into their wisdom, and they are fearless.

On the other hand, the experience of getting to really know oneself, and one’s personal power, can be unsettling. When leaders focus attention on themselves they may end up evaluating and comparing their current behavior to their internal standards and values, or worse still to those of others. They become self-conscious and may end up over-criticizing themselves and losing confidence. Read More

Share

Posted: November 11, 2013
Tags:
By:

The Interpersonal Lens: Advocacy and Inquiry

interpersonal lens Interpersonal communication is the exchange that takes place between people who are in some way “connected.” Through the words, tone of voice and non-verbal behaviors of others, leaders can learn how to connect with the full messages sent by others and decode those messages down to the nuance. By looking through the Interpersonal Lens, leaders see things that are often missed by those who are disinclined to develop a real connection with other people. Effective

Interpersonal Lens use allows leader the space to test their understanding of the verbal and written messages they receive. By tuning into the cues and clues sent by the other person, the leader gains insights into who they are and what they need. This information helps leaders adapt their leadership style and their communication methods to better fit with the preferences of the other person and in so doing stands a better chance of relating. The primary tool associated with the Interpersonal Lens is appreciative inquiry, a sophisticated listening and questioning practice of remaining “in the moment” with the communicator to gather accurate information and increase new understanding. Read More

Share

Posted: October 21, 2013
Tags:
By:

The Change Lens: Nothing Will Bring Back the Hour

Change LensThe “Change” Lens makes it possible for leaders to zoom in and out to see the complexity of change situations, the degree and pace of change that an organization can tolerate and the most effective methods to align people, communications and other resources to implement successful change. Leaders who are facile in the use of the Change Lens recognize that change is about “change” and it is about “transition”.

What? Sound redundant? Maybe not. Change is about a move to a new office building or a change in working hours. It is about the resignation of your mentor or the mandate to use new technology to perform your work. It is the switch from one group health plan to another, the addition of a major account to your workload, and the new company acquired by your employer. It does not matter if you create a change situation, are asked to lead a change situation created by another, or are the recipient of a change situation. Whatever the circumstance, wearing the Change Lens can help you identify the most effective methods to align yourself and others with the desired outcomes.

As a leader, use the Change Lens to help others navigate change: (source: Harvard Business Review. Leading Change: Why Transformation Efforts Fail, John P. Kotter, January, 2007.)

  • Develop a clear rationale for the nature and timing of the change
  • Build momentum by sharing background information about what will happen if the change is not realized
  • Mobilize efforts through the work of a guiding coalition
  • Communicate expectations, benefits and tradeoffs and send aligned messages about the future that is being created
  • Cast a wide net to find the early adopters and give them room to run; build momentum with quick successes and integrate new practices where appropriate
  • Combine successes to create a critical mass of support

Read More

Share

Posted: October 1, 2013
Tags:
By:

The Value Lens: Cutting to the Core

value lensThe starting point for leaders to ensure tight connections between strategy, organization and talent is learning how to use the Shockproof Lenses. These lenses provide a kind of super-sensing capability that makes it possible to keep the critical connections among strategy, organization and talent in place. We looked at The Systems Lens  in our last blog entry. Today we take a closer look at The Value Lens.

The “Value” Lens makes it possible for leaders to see, prioritize and act on the real, underlying and primary sources of value; leaders are able to use their understanding of business strategy to defeat the “tyranny of the urgent” and focus instead on those things that are most important to creating long-term value. Read More

Share