Posted: July 17, 2014
Tags: Leadership Skills
By: Dave Danesh
Reframing as a Leadership Skill
As a practitioner whose purpose for being is to help individuals develop their leadership skills, I am always looking for new ways to build leadership competency that are simultaneously sophisticated and simple. To be useful, leadership tools and frameworks need to meet the leadership demands of organizations that are becoming more complex—as Gary Hamel puts it, leaders need to “manage seemingly irreconcilable trade-offs”—and new tools need to be easy to master and usable right away.
At Chelsea C-Suite Solutions, we are currently working with an organization that is transitioning from a regional profit-centric structure to a borderless, matrix structure. There are dynamics and issues new to many leaders, and no surprise, their instinct is to use traditionally effective approaches to solving problems. The result has been frustration, inefficiency, resistance to change, feelings of being overwhelmed, and in darker moments, fears of inadequacy in meeting these new challenges.
Here’s an approach to help leaders that is incredibly simple—learn the art of reframing. What is often perceived as a “problem”—a situation with a unique right answer, might actually not be a problem at all. Maybe the organizational challenge is really an old “paradigm” that is no longer relevant or useful. Or maybe the situation is a “polarity”—a situation with two equally right answers that are interdependent—that needs to be “managed” by the leader, not solved. When leaders try to solve polarities, they (and everyone else) will get frustrated. When leaders try to solve a situation using an irrelevant paradigm, the result will be the same. Looked at another way, reframing actually frees up time by reducing the number of problems leaders are trying to “fix.”
The concept of a paradigm has been around a long time. Put simply, it is a way of seeing based on a shared set of assumptions. All mature organizations are full of paradigms. After all, they are extremely useful! They help us process a situation quickly in the moment, and consistently (e.g., the customer is always right). But when a paradigm is no longer useful, or irrelevant, we might be interpreting a situation as a problem incorrectly, and we could even be doing damage to the organization without realizing.
Posted: April 3, 2014
Tags: Coaching
By: Debra Jacobs Hamby
A New Breed of Top Leaders Who Value Coaching
In the old days…
When I first began coaching members of the C-suite nearly 30 years ago senior leaders had no real interest in working with executive coaches. Back then, coaching was rare and those who were labeled as coaches were frequently called productivity improvement consultants. These clinical or industrial psychologists were brought in to communicate performance expectations on behalf of the boss, usually in a last ditch attempt to get a derailed key leader back on track. Although top leaders occasionally tapped into the expertise of leadership experts they did so in secret and their new abilities were almost always developed serendipitously versus strategically.
Shift gears to today…
A 2013 Executive Coaching Survey conducted by the Stanford Business School with The Miles Group concluded that nearly one-third of CEOs have worked with an executive coach and/or participated in some sort of intensive leadership development experience. Almost half of senior executives in general have participated in coaching. Interestingly, all the leaders surveyed (100 percent) said they would welcome coaching to enhance their development.
Today’s top leaders recognize that senior level roles by design are isolated, complex and fraught with both political and psychological dynamics that are difficult and exhausting to sort out alone. Many times, these leaders experienced the collateral damage associated with bosses who led inappropriately because they were not sufficiently self-aware, vulnerable or emotionally intelligent. Choosing to achieve results where both people and work are aligned, these leaders are eager to get another perspective and gain new skills in areas that were once labeled as “soft” or low priority. The newest breed of top leaders have benefitted from coaching that helps them increase their self-awareness, make honest assessments about how their personality impacts business decisions, reflect on their ego/motives and clarify the values that will carry them through turbulent times. The consequences of the absence of these capabilities played out in front of these leaders early in their careers. They saw leaders flame out or destroy promising futures because they were not interested in their own growth and development as a top leader. Read More
Posted: November 25, 2013
Tags:
By: Debra Jacobs Hamby
The Self-Awareness Lens: Mirror, Mirror on the Wall
The Self-Awareness Lens is the one most often lost or buried in the bottom of the leader’s bag. Leaders see the word “self-awareness” and they back off as though the word itself might cause them to lose their ability to control the world around them. Yet, self-aware leaders hold the keys to the castle. Leaders from CEO Glenn Senk of Urban Outfitters to Alysa Miller CEO of Public Radio International advised University of Chicago Booth School of Business MBA students to “be self-aware by seeking as many varied experiences as possible, developing emotional intelligence and using good listening skills” as it provides a competitive edge. Leaders who are self-aware know what they treasure and hold dear, they understand how to create the right path by tapping into their wisdom, and they are fearless.
On the other hand, the experience of getting to really know oneself, and one’s personal power, can be unsettling. When leaders focus attention on themselves they may end up evaluating and comparing their current behavior to their internal standards and values, or worse still to those of others. They become self-conscious and may end up over-criticizing themselves and losing confidence. Read More
Posted: November 11, 2013
Tags:
By: Debra Jacobs Hamby
The Interpersonal Lens: Advocacy and Inquiry
Interpersonal communication is the exchange that takes place between people who are in some way “connected.” Through the words, tone of voice and non-verbal behaviors of others, leaders can learn how to connect with the full messages sent by others and decode those messages down to the nuance. By looking through the Interpersonal Lens, leaders see things that are often missed by those who are disinclined to develop a real connection with other people. Effective
Interpersonal Lens use allows leader the space to test their understanding of the verbal and written messages they receive. By tuning into the cues and clues sent by the other person, the leader gains insights into who they are and what they need. This information helps leaders adapt their leadership style and their communication methods to better fit with the preferences of the other person and in so doing stands a better chance of relating. The primary tool associated with the Interpersonal Lens is appreciative inquiry, a sophisticated listening and questioning practice of remaining “in the moment” with the communicator to gather accurate information and increase new understanding. Read More
Posted: October 21, 2013
Tags:
By: Debra Jacobs Hamby
The Change Lens: Nothing Will Bring Back the Hour
The “Change” Lens makes it possible for leaders to zoom in and out to see the complexity of change situations, the degree and pace of change that an organization can tolerate and the most effective methods to align people, communications and other resources to implement successful change. Leaders who are facile in the use of the Change Lens recognize that change is about “change” and it is about “transition”.
What? Sound redundant? Maybe not. Change is about a move to a new office building or a change in working hours. It is about the resignation of your mentor or the mandate to use new technology to perform your work. It is the switch from one group health plan to another, the addition of a major account to your workload, and the new company acquired by your employer. It does not matter if you create a change situation, are asked to lead a change situation created by another, or are the recipient of a change situation. Whatever the circumstance, wearing the Change Lens can help you identify the most effective methods to align yourself and others with the desired outcomes.
As a leader, use the Change Lens to help others navigate change: (source: Harvard Business Review. Leading Change: Why Transformation Efforts Fail, John P. Kotter, January, 2007.)
- Develop a clear rationale for the nature and timing of the change
- Build momentum by sharing background information about what will happen if the change is not realized
- Mobilize efforts through the work of a guiding coalition
- Communicate expectations, benefits and tradeoffs and send aligned messages about the future that is being created
- Cast a wide net to find the early adopters and give them room to run; build momentum with quick successes and integrate new practices where appropriate
- Combine successes to create a critical mass of support
Posted: October 1, 2013
Tags:
By: Debra Jacobs Hamby
The Value Lens: Cutting to the Core
The starting point for leaders to ensure tight connections between strategy, organization and talent is learning how to use the Shockproof Lenses. These lenses provide a kind of super-sensing capability that makes it possible to keep the critical connections among strategy, organization and talent in place. We looked at The Systems Lens in our last blog entry. Today we take a closer look at The Value Lens.
The “Value” Lens makes it possible for leaders to see, prioritize and act on the real, underlying and primary sources of value; leaders are able to use their understanding of business strategy to defeat the “tyranny of the urgent” and focus instead on those things that are most important to creating long-term value. Read More
Posted: September 17, 2013
Tags:
By: Debra Jacobs Hamby
Be the Leader You Seek
If aligning strategy, organization and talent will deliver lasting results, then it makes sense to get on with the job of figuring out how to best link them together, right? Finalize a well thought through strategy, design an organization that supports the realization of that strategy and fill out the structure with the very best people. Done. Finis. Run the credits. There’s only one problem.
Changing business conditions creep up unexpectedly just like new opportunities peek enticingly around the corner. It doesn’t matter if these changes make you sweat or swoon. When change occurs, even the tightest connections among strategy, organization and talent may bend or break. It becomes the role of leaders to take action to ensure effective recalibration.
When leaders see what has come undone and then act to create or sustain the linkages, Shockproof Leadership is in play. Only leaders can align strategy, organization and talent. Understandably, some leaders end up sitting on the sidelines, feeling overwhelmed by change and complexity, wishing someone else would put the linkages back in place. But most leaders recognize the special role they play in helping people navigate complexity and pull together toward shared goals and meaningful results. Read More
Posted: July 24, 2013
Tags: Executive Leader Coaching
By: Debra Jacobs Hamby
Leader, Heal Thyself
Recently, I met with a long time client to discuss the leadership development needs of two key players in his business. I had been coaching this client, who had recently been named CEO, for a few years now, but I had also noticed that as the change-of-control event approached he was seemingly slowing down in his commitment to our work together. Each time we spoke about this perceived shift in his enthusiasm, he assured me he was simply in a reactive mode given the exceptional demands on him as he transitioned from COO to CEO.
Despite these frequent reassurances, I wondered. How might I have kept him better engaged? Was it possible that I was no longer offering enough value? Was he just trying to let me down gently and move on?
Although we continued to meet by phone and occasionally would meet off-site at our set meeting time for an intense coaching session or catch up, I chose to read his change in focus as a clear sign that he was approaching the end of his work with me, whatever the rationale. I fully expected that now that he was “officially” the CEO he would follow in the footsteps of many other new chief executives and choose to believe he no longer needed to spend time working on himself as a leader. I knew the ego could play tricks on the cognitive capabilities of a rising executive. The new title all too often reinforced the ready belief that one is a finished product. The leader who was once fiercely engaged in his or her learning and development while in the running for a top tier job would, more often than not, put the brakes on full force once officially ordained. Coach fired. Relationship over.